Technology Solutions
Practical uses of language models: search your documents, classify, draft, with people in the loop.

03 / Technology Solutions6 capabilities · 7 deliverables
The problem
A language model can produce a convincing answer in seconds, which makes a prototype look finished. The difficulty shows up afterwards. Models sometimes state things that are false with complete confidence, they behave differently on inputs you did not test, and the cost per request can climb quickly once real volume arrives. A chatbot pointed at your website with no controls may quote a policy that does not exist.
Many businesses also reach for AI where a simpler tool would do. If the task is a fixed rule, a database query or a template, code is cheaper, faster and fully predictable. The useful cases are narrower: finding information in large piles of unstructured text, sorting messages into categories, summarising, and producing first drafts that a person then checks. Success depends on choosing those cases carefully and building the safeguards around them.
Sound familiar?
Our solution
We begin with a specific task and a way to judge it. For questions over your own material, we build retrieval: your documents are split, indexed and searched, and the model answers only from the passages found, with citations back to the source so a person can verify. For classification, we compare a model against your existing labels. For drafting, such as replies or summaries, the output goes to a person for approval before it is sent or saved.
We then evaluate on real examples from your business. We assemble a test set, measure how often the system is right on that set, review the failures with you, and repeat after each change. We do not quote accuracy figures in advance, because they depend on your data. We also plan for failure: low-confidence answers are routed to a human, prompts and inputs are logged, personal data is handled according to your policy, and token costs are estimated and capped. Where AI is not the right tool, we say so and use something simpler.
Capabilities
Search and question-answering across policies, contracts, manuals and past tickets, with answers grounded in retrieved passages and linked to the original source.
Sorting emails, tickets or forms into categories and pulling out fields such as dates, amounts and names, checked against labels your team has already assigned.
First drafts of replies, summaries and reports prepared for a person to edit and approve, with the approval step kept in the workflow rather than skipped.
A set of real examples with expected outcomes, run after every change, so you know whether a prompt or model update helped or hurt.
Confidence thresholds, fallbacks to a person, refusal rules for out-of-scope questions, input and output logging, and handling of sensitive or personal data.
Model selection by task, caching, prompt length limits and usage caps, with a cost-per-request estimate before you commit to volume.
Process
We pick one task with clear inputs, a definable right answer and a person who can check the output. We also rule out ideas where a rule or query would do the job better.
We examine the documents or messages involved, clean what is needed, and build a test set of real cases with your team's expected answers.
A working version is run against the test set. We review the errors together, adjust the design, and decide whether the results justify going further.
Integration into your tools with human review where needed, usage and cost tracking, and a regular look at flagged failures to improve it over time.
You receive
Where it fits best
FAQ
Language models can produce statements that are wrong, and no setup removes that risk completely. We reduce it by answering only from retrieved source text, showing citations, declining questions outside scope, and keeping a person in the loop for anything consequential. We also test on your real cases to see how it fails.
That depends on the provider and plan, so we check the data terms before choosing one. Business and API tiers from major providers generally do not train on your inputs by default, but we confirm it in writing for your case. For sensitive material we can minimise or mask personal data, restrict access, or use a model hosted in a controlled environment.
Cost depends on the model, the length of the text processed and the volume. We estimate it from your actual documents and expected usage before you commit, and add caps and monitoring so a spike does not become a surprise bill. Simple tasks can often use a smaller, cheaper model.
We do not build it with that goal. The reliable uses speed up people by finding information, sorting inputs or preparing drafts, while a person stays accountable for the decision. Tasks that are high stakes, ambiguous or relationship-driven should remain with people.
Send a few lines about what you're trying to move. We'll reply with questions, a rough shape of the work, or an honest no.
Or write to hello@asoftbit.com